Advertisement
Response from Dr. Young

Thanks for your post.
It seems like you've researched and summarized your treatment options quite well. To me the single overwhelming reason to switch from Combivir + efavirenz to Atripla in your case is to go to a once-daily HIV regimen.
Beyond that, then you get into the realm of subjectives. Yes, the AZT in Combivir can cause mild anemia and fatigue in otherwise asymptomatic persons, but it's also fair to say that your blood pressure meds and/or depression could also be responsible for fatigue. It would be difficult for me to get too excited about the prospects of switching you from an HIV regimen that is as well tolerated as "taking aspirin".
There is also evidence that among persons starting AZT containing regimens there's a increased risk of fat loss- unexpectedly, in recent studies, this risk seems to be greater among persons taking efavirenz than lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra). This later point highlights that community perception can actually differ from the best controlled scientific study.
In the end, switching comes with a individually-determined set of risks and benefits. You've not mentioned whether or not you have significant risk of developing kidney disease-- the characteristic and rare complication of tenofovir (part of Truvada and Atripla). In this regard, your high blood pressure puts you in a somewhat different risk category. Ask your doctor about your kidney function (not just the creatinine level, but the "creatinine clearance")-- if this is abnormal, I'd be hesitant to switch. If not, then the playing field levels on this characteristic.
Before switching HIV meds, I would certainly explore the possibility that your other medications might be contributing to your fatigue (relevant to this would be an understanding for just how mild or severe your anemia is). If you don't have any demonstrable lipoatrophy, I'd wouldn't be in a rush to switch. On the other hand, if you have thinning of the fat or perceive significant benefit from switching to a once-daily regimen, or if the copayment reduction (from two to one) is attractive, this would tip the balance in the counter direction.
Hope this (but decidedly undecided) discussion helps. BY
|