Aug 4, 2001
Why is there no Gold Standard when testing for the presence of HIV? Instead of looking for antibodies thought to be exclusive to HIV, wouldn't it be better to isolate actual virus in a suspected HIV+ person?
Why are the standards of testing and diagnosis different in most countries to that of the US? If I test positive in the US, I may not test postive in let's say Canada or the UK. Don't you think that's odd?
Are the tests standard in most countries for diseases like, let's say, Chicken Pox or Hepatitis?
Response from Dr. Holodniy
I cannot answer why testing is not standardized.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- How To Treat Candidiasis Blurry Vision?
- How Rapidly Can One Die From Hiv If Treatment Starts Too Late?
- Can You Get Hiv By A Haircut?
- Where Do You Get Swollen Lymph Nodes If You Have Hiv?
- Average T-cell Count For Hiv Negative Person
- Are Swelling Of The Feet And Ankles Symptoms Of Neuropathy?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.