 | ||
   | ||
Email
Glossary |
|
Long time for being undetectable and now detectable Jan 29, 2012 Good morning. I started Atripla in 10/2010 with VL 200.000 and CD4 223. These are the results until now (VL and cd4): 10/2010 200.000 220 11/2010 1.100 300 01/2011 340 450 03/2011 382 380 04/2011 46 390 05/2011 46 540 07/2011 <40 530 10/2011 <40 530 01/2012 57 550 I started with high viremia and I needed 8 months for going undetectable. Now my viremia is a bit detectable. My doctor ordered new exames in 2 months. Should I be a bit worried and should I do new exames next month or can I wait with no worries another 2 months? Do you think Atripla is not a perfect solution for me, cause viremia is not very low? Really thanks! |
||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
 |
| Response from Dr. Holodniy
 I agree with your doctor's plan and I would not be concerned. I would stick with the Atripla for now, unless the tests next time indicate a much higher viral load, in which case you may need to make a treatment adjustment. | ||||||||
 Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Q&A TERMS OF USE
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Review our complete terms of use and copyright notice.
