|Are HIV Patients Still Losing Sulfer?
Sep 26, 2010
Many years ago, at either a DAIDS sponsored pathogenesis meeting, or an International AIDS Society Meeting, I heard a speaker (Ph.D. or M.D.) state that intracellular levels of glutathione were far more predictive of HIV disease progression than CD4+ T cell counts, or any other measure.
About that same time a husband and wife team from Stanford, who are credited with inventing Florescent Activated Cell Sorting technology, ran a small short study of N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC) in HIV+ patients. NAC is considered a good source for sulfer; and along with Glutamine, Tryptophan and Selenium is considered a building block for glutathione.
In the book "What Really Causes AIDS", the loss of glutathione was credited with HIV disease progression:
I continue to hear that micro-nutrients likely play a major role in the health of an HIV patient. Yet, I can't seem to find many follow-up studies that clearly show a benefit to taking any micro-nutrients.
Backing-up, the speaker who stated that intracellular levels of glutathione were the most predictive of disease progression ALSO stated that using a marker for glutathione and a Florescent Activated Cell Sorting machine would produce *** almost exclusively *** T cells from (I think PBMCs.
I would like to know if you are aware of any recent studies looking at restoring intracellular levels of glutathione to halt HIV disease progression.
| Response from Dr. Holodniy
I am not aware of any randomized control studies, but there is a lot of basic science work that has been published recently on the topic.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.