|How Low Should We Go?
Jan 17, 2010
Hi my hospital is now using a newer way of measuring the VL. Previously we were told we were < 40 or higher, now its < 20. Apart from the obvious difference is there any actually benefit in this difference. Recently my bloods were shown to be <27 after being <20, should I be concerned seeing as a few months ago both would be fine. Is this not just going to cause anxiety over nothing.? And how low should we go/aim for? Thanks.
| Response from Dr. Holodniy
That is a great question. We have been operating under the assumption for the last several years that < 50/ < 40 are where patients need to be. This is still likely to be the case. Newer versions of viral load tests (so-called supersensitive assays) are pushing the detection limit down toward zero. There is some data to suggest that any circulating virus that can be measured could lead to failure of a particular regimen. But we would really need a randomized prospective clinical trial to determine whether there is a clinical benefit of knowing and maintaining the level below 20 or below 5.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.