Viral Load Isn't Everything?
Feb 25, 2006
I was kindof floored when this was related to me, so I didn't quite catch on when the Dr. told me; so I'm hoping you can re-explain it to me! I had been deluded into thinking that as long as I was <50 I was in the pink. My first viral load was 54, then 53, then 53, then 51, then <50 for about 7 years now. But suddenly, my CD4 has gone below 325, and everyone's in an uproar again. Can you explain why I'm bordering on being in trouble when I have no detectable viral load? (Though of course I appreciate that <50 doesn't mean zero). My last CD4s were 211, 276, and 230. I've been + for 20 years, and have never been treated.
Response from Dr. Holodniy
I am not sure I would be part of the uproar. The key to your story is longevity and 20 years of infection. People may be reacting to a trend, recognizing that serious infections could develop if your CD4 counts dip below 200-250, regardless of whether your viral load is undetectable.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.