Current ideas on VL vs. infectiousness
Feb 7, 2001
I have recently been able to lower my VL to 2,000 after being in the 100,000+ range since my diagnosis (over 18 months ago). I have heard and read that a lower viral load presents a lower danger of transmission to a non-infected sexual partner. As I am currently seeing and being intimate with a negative man, I am curious about the veracity of this assertion. What are your thoughts on this and what, if any, tests and/or studies have been done to support your answer? Thank you in advance.
Response from Dr. Holodniy
A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine found in discordant couples in Africa, that HIV infection in the negative partner was unlikely if the viral load was < 1500/ml. I am not sure I would test the observation. Safety first. MH
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
- Protected Anal Sex Risks
- Swallowing Cum How Long Does It Take To Test Positive For AIDS
- Is Sore On Tongue An Acute Symptom Of HIV?
- How Do You Know If You Have Systemic Candidiasis?
- Pain In Penis After Having Sex During Period What Are The Chances Of HIV
- How Do I Get Rid Of Vaginal Pain After Sex?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.