|ELISA VS. BLOOD TEST?
Mar 13, 2000
Hello Doctor. 3.5 months after a possible exposure i got a general blood test and a hiv test. The hiv test read: negative. But the blood test shows a low the average lymphocyte count, 20 of the average 24-44 and a high neutrophils count, 75 of the average 40-70. So Im very scared. Does this mean im at the hiv acute infection but the hiv test still says negative. Im very concerned, please help me. Those blood test results shown like an infection is present, so what could that mean? So the HIV can not be as telling as the blood test? Thank you very much for your answer.
Response from Dr. Feinberg
All this probably means is that you had a slightly left (or right, depending on your politics) of center complete blood count. I wouldn't overinterpret it. If you are still HIV- 6 months post-exposure, you can relax completely. Until then, you can probably relax 95%+. So get retested, and then stop worrying.
Wart and Rash?
Risk From 86?
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.