Confused, please offer your advice
Feb 21, 2011
Hello, I have read a lot on this forum and am wondering what your opinion is on my situation. I had a risky incident involving a needlestick that I am worried was infected with HIV and hep c blood. I had antibody tests done until the 3 month mark, all of which came back negative for HIV and hep c. I have read on this forum that 6 months would be considered conclusive for someone at risk of simultaneous coinfection. However I also had liver enzyme tests done, and my AST and ALT were normal, at 32 and 16 respectively. My total bilirubin was 0.3. I am wondering if this is a good sign that I did not acquire acute hepatitis c infection? I don't know whether 3 months after infection if my levels should be high, or if they would have dropped down already by then. Should I still be retested at 6 months for both to be certain? Is there a good chance that my negative antibody tests at 3 months could change? Your advice would be greatly appreciated
Response from Dr. McGovern
Yes the routine advice is for follow-up at 6 months. However, I am certain that you will have good news then as well so I wouldn't lose sleep on this!
If it is a cost issue you are worried about, then I do agree with your point about having normal liver function tests at 3 months.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.