|Response to Hep C & HIV
Feb 21, 2006
Why are you suggesting that this woman go to an ID doctor right away if you don't beleive she is infected? I know you say that she probably isn't but an HIV test at six months is supposed to be conclusive. Why not have her just repeat the standard ELISA? Why should she do an RNA if supposedly the ELISA is conclusive at this point? I understand why she should be tested for Hep C beacuse she never was tested before. Please explain your reasoning.
| Response from Dr. Dieterich
No test is 100% accurate and waiting for anitibody tests causes you to miss the acute infection, either HIV or HCV. This is important because treating acute HIV and HCV is an entirely different matter than treating the chronic diseases. The results of treating the acute infection are much better than if you wait for a chronic infection! That is why I think she should have the RNA tests. DTD
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.