why no liver biopsy
Mar 12, 2002
In May 1999 I was diagnosed with hepatitis C. I just recently completed a year of rebetron, interferon treatment in Oct. 2001. My Dr did not feel it necessary to give me a liver biopsy. Another ddoctor told me that a biopsy is part of the diagnostic procedure. Under what circumstances would you feel it not necessary to take a liver biopsy? Why would a doctor skip this if it is part of the procedure?
Response from Dr. Fried
A liver biopsy is the only accurate way to know the true status of your liver in regards to the presence of inflammation (irritation) or fibrosis (scarring). Your doctor may not have performed a liver biopsy if he/she felt there were contraindications or if there was clinical evidence that fibrosis was present. Some doctors feel genotypes two or three do not need biopsies since the response to treatment is so good. In my practice, I almost always perform liver biopsies so I can get the most accurate picture of the patients liver disease. This information is very helpful to the patient in understanding their prognosis.
Get Email Notifications When This Forum Updates or Subscribe With RSS
This forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not rendering medical, mental health, legal or other professional advice or services. If you have or suspect you may have a medical, mental health, legal or other problem that requires advice, consult your own caregiver, attorney or other qualified professional.
Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither TheBody.com nor any advertiser is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.