why do hiv doctors keep doing this
Jul 20, 2009
A man wrote you asking about his wasting. He didn't even mention the words "fat" or "lipoatrophy". All he said was that he's skin and bones. And you immediately started talking about lipoatrophy. Why??
Are you doctors really just puppets for the drug companies?
Is it that acknowledging that treatment experienced patients who continue to waste muscle prove that the hiv meds aren't addressing wasting? So you have to focus as much attention on fat loss as possible, so to make their wasting seem like a side effect of the meds, rather than a continued symptom of the hiv which the meds simply cannot help?
Listen carefully, "doc", hiv positive people continue to lose MUSCLE with or without meds. "Lipoatrophy" is a little cosmetic phenomenon that can occur in patients on meds. But when you see major body shape change in hiv'ers, you're seeing a degradation of muscle mass, with fat usually taking its place. That's right, INCREASED fat, not loss of it.
I'm so sick of seeing these poor hiv'ers with shriveled little rubber thighs, being told by their ignoramus doctors that they suffer from fat loss, and that is why they've lost their legs. Don't you guys know the first thing about anatomy? That a man's thighs are made up of much more lean mass than fat? And that when a male thigh goes from 30" to 20" in circumference, it's IMPOSSIBLE for them to have not lost muscle?
I really have to create a website dedicated to debunking this "lipoatrophy" nonsense in hiv'ers with thinning limbs. Because you doctors can't be trusted to do the right thing. Either that, or you're stupid. Either way, you're totally incompetent.
Athletic sprinters, with thick, hard quads (thigh muscles) wind up with thin, flabbier thighs after they become poz. And even THEY'RE being told by their hiv doctors that their thighs changed size and shape due to lipoatrophy. It's just not good science. And it's stupid. Try to resist the urge to be stupid.
|