Please Note: Due to volume considerations, not all questions can be answered. Questions most likely to be answered will be those of general interest to a broad group of visitors to this forum. Questions pertaining to a specific case; requests for diagnosis, medical advice, or second opinion; or requests for opinions about untested alternative therapies will generally not be answered.
|
|
 |  |
 |
 |
Oral Sex on a HIV+ partner
Nov 27, 2002
My partner and I were together for about one year and them broke things off. During the time after the breakup, he apparently found that we was HIV+. I was tested about 3-4 months after our last sexual encounter and was HIV negative. Recently, we I preformed oral sex on him briefly without any known pre or ejaculation in my mouth. I need to know if I have been exposed to the virus for completing this act. Should I start taking PEP treatments? I understand that it all depends on the situation with a person mouth. I have a tooth that has decayed and needs a root canal, also I have a few other teeth that need caps. No recent dental work has been done. I believe that I also may have brushed my teeth about and hour before the oral sex act. I found out his status after performing oral sex on him and now I'm extremely paniced. Should I be retested? Take the PEP program? Please advise.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Response from Dr. Remien
The best information we have says that testing at three months is conclusive for the vast majority of the population. In unusual circumstances, repeat testing at six months might be indicated for a person who has had an exposure to a person known to HIV infected or if the person is experiencing unexplained symptoms indicative of acute HIV infection despite negative antibody tests at three months. In those cases, testing at six months is a precaution to rule out the tiny possibility that the HIV antibody test was not accurate at three months. However, testing at three months is highly accurate. If you are still concerned, see your doctor.
Regarding PEP - you are right, this needs to be judged on a case by case basis, with a qualified physician. However, it is only effective if administered within a very short period of time after exposure. It is best if treatment begins within several hours after a high-risk exposure, or if necessary, up to 24-36 hours after the exposure. The benefits of beginning treatment beyond 36 hours are not really known. I do not believe it would be recommended at all if it is more 72 hours after exposure.
It sounds like the risk of infection is very low given your description. You should consult with your physician, but there seems to be no need for you to "panic."
|
|
|
 Please remember that this forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not engaged through this
forum in rendering legal or medical advice or professional services. Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible
for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither The Body nor any sponsor is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Questions and messages posted to this forum are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of The Body, Body Health Resources Corporation or any sponsor of this
forum. While neither The Body nor Body Health Resources Corporation regularly reviews posted content, we reserve the right to delete, move, or
edit postings if we deem it appropriate under the circumstances. Visitors submitting questions remain solely responsible for the content of their
messages.
Information provided by experts is general only and should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease, or relied upon as
legal or other professional advice. This information is not a substitute for professional advice or care. If you have or suspect you may have a
health or legal problem, you should consult your own health care provider or your attorney.
Copyright notice.
|
|
|
|
