Please Note: Due to volume considerations, not all questions can be answered. Questions most likely to be answered will be those of general interest to a broad group of visitors to this forum. Questions pertaining to a specific case; requests for diagnosis, medical advice, or second opinion; or requests for opinions about untested alternative therapies will generally not be answered.
|
|
 |  |
 |
 |
Shoud I have biopsy or a PAP smear of my butt?
Dec 23, 2001
I am hiv+ for over 13 years. Upon recent internal examination, my doctor has discovered that my rectum has evidence of hyperplasia and leukoplakia. He wants to do a couple of biopsies. Having had surgeries and excisions in this area before, i know from experience that they can be very painful and bothersome for a considerable time period. Should i be requesting a far less invasive procedure such as a PAP smear or is a biopsy the standard? what is the difference? is one better than the other? thanks for your help. Don
|
 |
|
 |
|
Response from Dr. Dezube
Dear Don:
You ask a great question-- which is better a PAP smear or a biopsy of your butt? A PAP smear is really a screening tool. With a PAP smear, your provider inserts a swab into your butt, removes the cells lining the area, and sends them for an analysis. This is very akin to the cervical PAP smear which has prevented many many women from dying of cervical cancer. If the PAP smear shows abnormal cells, i.e. pre-cancer cells, then the next step is to have someone look up you butt and take biopsies and treat any abnormalities appropriately.
In your case, you have already been diagnosed with areas of hyperplasia and leukoplasia. Unfortunately only a biopsy will tell you and your provider what lies beneath. Although you could have just a painless PAP smear done, you run the risk of having the PAP smear under-report a cancer.
So in short,
PAP smear-- best for screening. A PAP smear tells providers whom they should recommend for further evaluation.
Biopsy-- best for getting an accurate diagnosis.
Good luck! I agree that surgeries and excisions can be bothersome. Not having the surgeries and having to deal with the consquences (i.e., untreated cancer) can be even more bothersome.
|
|
|
 Please remember that this forum is designed for educational purposes only, and experts are not engaged through this
forum in rendering legal or medical advice or professional services. Experts appearing on this page are independent and are solely responsible
for editing and fact-checking their material. Neither The Body nor any sponsor is the publisher or speaker of posted visitors' questions or the experts' material.
Questions and messages posted to this forum are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of The Body, Body Health Resources Corporation or any sponsor of this
forum. While neither The Body nor Body Health Resources Corporation regularly reviews posted content, we reserve the right to delete, move, or
edit postings if we deem it appropriate under the circumstances. Visitors submitting questions remain solely responsible for the content of their
messages.
Information provided by experts is general only and should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease, or relied upon as
legal or other professional advice. This information is not a substitute for professional advice or care. If you have or suspect you may have a
health or legal problem, you should consult your own health care provider or your attorney.
Copyright notice.
|
|
|
|
